Numerical, verbal, logical, mechanical and spatial questions mixed in one sitting, like the real thing. Every question comes with a worked solution.
Free · No sign-up · Scored the moment you finish






A cognitive ability test measures how quickly and accurately you learn, reason and solve problems across different kinds of question. Employers use it as a broad predictor of job performance before interview. You answer a mix of verbal, numerical and logical questions against the clock, choosing the best answer each time. It is one of the strongest single indicators of how well someone picks up a new role.
Start the free test. It opens full screen, without leaving this page.
Question 1 of 10
A team of 6 people completes a task in 8 days. Working at the same rate, how many days would 4 people take to complete the same task?
Answer: C. 12
The work is 6 multiplied by 8, which is 48 person-days; shared among 4 people that is 48 divided by 4, or 12 days. Fewer people means more days, so 8 times 4 divided by 6 (about 5.3) scales the wrong way. The value 6 subtracts the two lost workers from the 8 days. The value 48 leaves the answer as the total person-days without dividing.
Question 2 of 10
Cautious is to reckless as frugal is to which word?
Answer: D. Extravagant
Cautious and reckless are opposites, so the answer must be the opposite of frugal, which is extravagant. Thrifty is a synonym of frugal rather than its opposite. Careful belongs to the cautious side of the first pair, not the frugal one. Wealthy describes having money rather than being the opposite of frugal.
Question 3 of 10
The average of five numbers is 20. Four of the numbers are 12, 18, 25 and 15. What is the fifth number?
Answer: A. 30
Five numbers averaging 20 have a total of 5 times 20, or 100. The four given numbers sum to 70, so the fifth is 100 minus 70, which is 30. The value 17.5 averages only the four given numbers (70 divided by 4). The value 10 multiplies the mean by four instead of five before subtracting. The value 20 simply repeats the mean.
Question 4 of 10
All the items in the sale are discounted. Some discounted items are electrical goods. Which statement must be true?
Answer: B. Some electrical goods are discounted.
“Some discounted items are electrical goods” can be turned around to “some electrical goods are discounted”. Concluding that some sale items are electrical goods is the undistributed-middle error, because the discounted electrical goods need not be the sale items. Concluding that all electrical goods are discounted turns a “some” into an “all”. Concluding that all discounted items are in the sale reverses “all sale items are discounted” into a converse that does not follow.
Question 5 of 10
A price rises by 10%, and the new price then falls by 10%. What is the net change from the original price?
Answer: D. A 1% decrease
A 10% rise multiplies the price by 1.1; a 10% fall then multiplies by 0.9. Together 1.1 times 0.9 is 0.99, a 1% decrease. Assuming no change treats the two as cancelling, but the fall is taken on the higher, risen price, so it removes a little more than the rise added. A 1% increase has the right size but the wrong direction. A 2% decrease doubles the effect.
Question 6 of 10
Which word is closest in meaning to “concise”?
Answer: A. Brief
Concise means expressed in few words, so it is closest to brief. Detailed is its opposite. Vague concerns a lack of clarity rather than length, and a concise statement can be perfectly clear. Complex describes difficulty rather than brevity.
Question 7 of 10
Three colleagues share a bonus of £480 in the ratio 3:2:1. How much does the colleague with the largest share receive?
Answer: C. £240
The ratio has 3 plus 2 plus 1, which is 6 parts, so each part is £480 divided by 6, or £80. The largest share is 3 parts, £240. The value £80 is a single part. The value £160 is the two-part middle share. The value £288 divides by 5 parts instead of 6, using only 3 plus 2 and omitting the last term.
Question 8 of 10
In an office of 30 people, 18 drink tea and 14 drink coffee. Every person drinks at least one of the two. How many drink both?
Answer: B. 2
Because everyone drinks at least one, adding the two groups counts the both-drinkers twice: 18 plus 14 is 32, which is 2 more than the 30 people, so 2 drink both. The value 32 stops at 18 plus 14 without removing the overlap. The value 12 is 30 minus 18, the tea-only complement, not the overlap. The value 16 is 30 minus 14 in the same mistaken way.
Question 9 of 10
Four of these five numbers share a property that the fifth does not: 64, 27, 100, 8, 125. Which is the odd one out?
Answer: D. 100
The numbers 27, 8, 125 and 64 are perfect cubes (3 cubed, 2 cubed, 5 cubed and 4 cubed); 100 is a square but not a cube, so it is the odd one out. Singling out 64 as a perfect square still leaves it 4 cubed, fitting the cube rule the others share. Picking 8 or 125 selects by size only, though both are cubes.
Question 10 of 10
Everyone in the finance team submitted their report on time. Ravi submitted his report late. Which conclusion follows?
Answer: A. Ravi is not in the finance team.
Since everyone in the finance team was on time and Ravi was late, Ravi cannot be in the finance team, by modus tollens. Claiming he is in the team contradicts this. Claiming the finance team missed the deadline contradicts the premise that they submitted on time. Claiming Ravi will be disciplined adds a consequence the statements never mention.
| Score | What it suggests |
|---|---|
| 9 to 10 | Comfortably above the bar for most graduate schemes |
| 7 to 8 | Around the typical pass mark. Worth practising for speed |
| 5 to 6 | Below most employer thresholds. Focus on method before speed |
| 4 or fewer | Work through the worked solutions above before retrying |
Employers set their own thresholds and many sift on the top percentage of applicants rather than a fixed mark, so treat these as a guide.
One test tells you the style. A pack gives you the pace: batches under time pressure, marked, with the working shown.
A cognitive test samples several subjects in one sitting. Each has its own full free test and guide; drill your weakest subject on its own page.
Percentages, ratios and data interpretation under time pressure.
Practise numerical reasoningGears, levers, pulleys and circuits: applied physics principles.
Practise mechanical reasoningMost employers score you against other candidates, not against a fixed pass mark: your raw score becomes a percentile. Attempting questions matters, because most tests are built so few candidates finish, and guessing usually pays: negative marking is rare, but check the instructions.
The time pressure is deliberate, usually around a minute a question, and few candidates finish comfortably. ** A minute lost struggling with one mechanical item is a numerical question you never reach, and both are worth the same mark.
Employers use cognitive ability tests because general mental ability is one of the strongest single predictors of job performance, especially in roles that involve complex, fast-moving decisions. The test signals not just aptitude but adaptability and composure under pressure.
It is also efficient. One sitting assesses several skills at once, giving a broad read on a candidate at modest cost, which is why it has become one of the most common recruitment tools in use.
That is why it turns up across industries as different as finance and the armed forces, and why it is especially favoured for roles built on high-stakes judgement, such as pilot, doctor, lawyer and engineer, where the link between test score and on-the-job performance is considered particularly close.
Practice Aptitude Tests · Original data
Results from every test in our Cognitive Ability pack, past and present.
Key finding1 in 8 Cognitive Ability sittings scores full marks.
45% scored 80% or more, and 16% scored under 40%.
Share of sittings in each score band.
Regular practisers went from 72% on their first test to 74% on their fifth.
18,739 people who took five or more tests.
Speed makes little difference here.
Typical pace: 40 seconds a question.
The methods behind the questions above, from our team